Search for Stocks /

Filtron Engineers Ltd FY26: From Ashes to ₹76 Crore

General information and entertainment, not investment advice. The author is not a SEBI-registered adviser or research analyst. No recommendation, no promised returns. Markets carry risk including loss of capital. Figures may not be current. Consult a registered adviser before acting.


1 — At a Glance

Filtron Engineers has staged a resurrection. After trading near zero for years, the company posted ₹76 Cr in revenue in FY26, swinging from a ₹30 lakh loss in FY25 to a ₹4.15 Cr net profit. The balance sheet, however, looks like a construction site: promoter grip has fallen from 61% to 2.3% after an open offer in June 2026, equity capital jumped from ₹2.6 Cr to ₹63.5 Cr (mostly dilution), borrowings spiked to ₹16 Cr, and cash burn in operations hit ₹23 Cr despite the top-line bounce.

The market pays 135x trailing earnings. Debtors sit at 159 days. Operating cash is negative. Something triggered the turnaround—but the balance sheet is screaming caution.


2 — Introduction

Filtron was incorporated in 1982. For decades it designed and built dairy, food, and beverage processing equipment on turnkey contracts—stainless steel reactors, batch cookers, that sort of specialized kit. The company was publicly listed and fairly dormant.

Between 2017 and 2024, its shares were suspended from BSE trading. The business had stalled. No revenue, net worth eroded.

In September 2025, two individuals (Tarak Gor and Jayesh Rawal) announced an open offer at ₹10 per share. By December 2025, they had struck share purchase agreements for 52% of the company and launched a formal acquisition. The shareholders voted. On June 2, 2026, the open offer closed. Control had shifted. Four original promoters were reclassified as public shareholders, their holding diluted to a rounding error.

Parallel to this, the company’s operations seem to have restarted. FY26 brought its first meaningful sales in years: ₹76 Cr.


3 — Business Model: WTF Do They Even Do?

The stated mandate is still dairy and food processing equipment—design, fabrication, assembly, turnkey delivery. The company makes tanks, cookers, spray dryers, evaporators. All in stainless steel, aluminium, mild steel. All bespoke.

This is a low-volume, high-spec business. Orders are big, lumpy, and require credit. Customers—milk processors, juice firms, breweries, chemical plants—pay on delivery (or worse, in instalments after). The equipment takes months to build. Work-in-progress ties up cash.

In the old years, the company had a mini-dairy-plant product line: turnkey solutions for starting a micro dairy. That business was gone by FY24 (orders had dried up).

FY26 shows ₹76 Cr in revenue. But the cost of goods was ₹76.9 Cr—higher than sales. The company clawed back ₹6.7 Cr in inventory changes (possibly reversing old write-offs or selling stock). Employee cost was ₹1 Cr. Other expenses, ₹1.1 Cr. The net: a ₹3.7 Cr operating profit at 4.9% margin.

So: specialized, capital-light (no capex visible), historically dormant, now shipping jobs again. Margins thin. Payment terms brutal.


4 — Financials Overview

Figures are consolidated, in ₹ crore.

MetricFY25FY26Change
Sales0.2576.07+30,328%
Other Income0.230.72+213%
Operating Profit(0.40)3.73
Depreciation0.130.14+8%
Interest0.16
PBT(0.30)4.15
Tax
Net Profit(0.30)4.15
EPS (Full Year)(1.15)0.65

The rebound is genuine: ₹76 Cr is a full year of operations resuming, not a quarter’s blip. But the speed is suspicious. No capex was required (capex line: ₹0.05 Cr). The company had a manufacturing facility in Pune that was idle for years—it was simply switched on.

The quarterly pattern shows Q4 (Mar 2026) accounted for ₹65.1 Cr of the ₹76 Cr total. That’s 86% of annual sales in one quarter. The prior quarters were negligible. This suggests either a single giant order hitting in Q4, or aggressive quarter-end billings to existing contracts.


5 — Market Expectations & Historical Multiples

This section describes how the market is currently pricing the company and how that compares with its own history and peer group. It is descriptive, not predictive.

MetricCurrentHistorical Average (5yr)Peer Median
P/E135.023.9
EV/EBITDA128.016.3
P/B9.32.7
ROE14.8%5.0%
ROCE11.3%5.95%

The market currently pays 135x the most recent trailing earnings, versus a peer set median of 24x. The enterprise value per rupee of EBITDA (trailing) sits at 128x, well above peers at 16x. The price-to-book ratio, 9.3x, is 3.4x the peer median.

What is the market pricing in? Three possible narratives:

Narrative 1: Recovery story. The company was moribund for years. The new management has restarted operations and posted ₹76 Cr in revenue in one fiscal year. The market may be betting that orders will stick, margins will normalize to historical levels (if historical records exist from the 2010s), and the equity base will grow. At 135x, investors are willing to pay handsomely for the belief in recovery.

Narrative 2: Cheap asset. The old promoters held 61%

Read Full 16 Point breakdown. Continue reading →
Members get full access to every article.
Become a member
Already a member? Log in
Read Full 16 Point breakdown. Continue reading →