01 — At a Glance
The Steel Company That’s Becoming a Battery Manufacturer
- 52-Week High / Low₹290 / ₹167
- Q3 FY26 Revenue₹1,139 Cr
- Q3 FY26 PAT₹143 Cr
- Q3 EPS₹2.14
- Annualised EPS (Q3×4)₹8.56
- Book Value₹78.1
- Price to Book3.28x
- Dividend Yield0.39%
- Debt / Equity0.04x
- Net Debt / EBITDANegative (Net Cash)
Auditor’s Opening Rant: Godawari Power delivered Q3 FY26 revenue of ₹1,139 crore with PAT of ₹143 crore, hamstrung by a pellet plant accident in late September. Despite the operational hiccup, margins expanded YoY, iron ore mining production soared 46%, and the company commissioned a 2-MTPA pellet plant in December. CRISIL upgraded the outlook to Positive on February 16, 2026. The stock returned 43.5% over 12 months while the company spent ₹600-700 crore on capex and approved another ₹3,500 crore over the next two fiscals. This is a company that wants to be multiple things—and simultaneously.
02 — Introduction
Steel, Pellets, Mining, Solar, Batteries. Pick a Industry, Any Industry.
Welcome to Godawari Power & Ispat. A decade ago, this was a straightforward mid-cap—captive iron ore mines feeding a steel plant. Margins were predictable. Growth was orderly. No one was losing sleep over balance sheets.
Today? The story has fractured into a thousand sparkling pieces. Mining capacity expanding from 3.05 MTPA to 6.7 MTPA. Pellet production jumping from 2.7 to 4.7 MTPA. Cold rolling mill (CRM) of 0.7 MTPA coming in March 2027. Solar capacity 3x’ing to 540 MW. And the kicker—a 20 GWh battery energy storage system (BESS) plant commissioned by Q4 FY27 with ₹1,025 crore capex. Across two fiscals, the company will burn ₹3,500 crore in capex. Revenue is expected to jump from ₹5,238 crore (TTM) to ₹12,000-15,000 crore by FY28. This is not a slow-motion expansion. This is a wartime capex cycle disguised as peacetime profit-taking.
Q3 FY26 had an accident at the pellet plant that knocked September volumes. But margins expanded YoY. The February 2026 concall revealed that management has already received Consent to Operate for Ari Dongri mines at 6 MTPA and environmental clearance for mining and beneficiation. This is a company running at full sprint even when its plants are catching fire. Literally.
Concall Gold (Feb 2026): “We are almost booked till end of this quarter” (for pellets). Management expects to clear Q3’s inventory pile by Q4. Domestic steel demand sharp rebound cited for Dec 2025 onwards. The pellet accident is being treated as a speed bump, not a speedway closure.
03 — Business Model: Vertical Integration on Steroids
They Mine It, Blend It, Melt It, Roll It, And Now They’ll Store It.
Godawari’s base model is textbook vertically integrated steel. Two captive iron ore mines (Ari Dongri, Boria Tibu) supply 85% of iron ore needs. This feeds into a pellet plant (currently 4.7 MTPA post-Dec ’25 commission), which in turn feeds a sponge iron facility (594,000 TPA), steel melting shop (525,000 TPA billets), rolling mills (MS rounds, HB wires), and a fabrication yard. Power is captive—98 MW thermal, 42 MW waste heat recovery, 20 MW biomass, 36 MW coal, plus 70 MW + 22 MW + 18.5 MW solar plants already operational and another 375 MW coming online.
The 2024-26 period flipped the script. Management realized that: (a) captive mining expansion hits a ceiling if you run single-line pellet plant, (b) the steel market is finicky but industrial lubricants are boring, so batteries must be sexy, and (c) one plant makes you dependent on realisations—multiple products, multiple geographies, multiple margin profiles = safety. Enter the CRM (cold rolled mill) for galvanized/tinplate plays, and the BESS plant for stationary energy storage (a ₹12 trillion+ market opportunity by 2030 in India).
Backward integration now means mining isn’t just feeding your plant—it’s feeding your expanding capacity matrix. The Ari Dongri expansion (2.35 → 6 MTPA) provides the raw material. The beneficiation plant (5.4 MTPA) upgrades concentrate quality. The pellet expansion channels it upmarket. The CRM creates finished goods. Solar powers it all at ₹3/unit vs grid ₹7-11/unit. And the BESS plant is the wildcard—a ₹1,025 crore bet that 20 GWh of capacity (with 7% EBITDA margins) will become relevant as India scales renewable energy storage.
Mining Cap6.7 MTPAFrom 3.05 MTPA
Pellet Cap4.7 MTPAFrom 2.7 MTPA
CRM Cap0.7 MTPAComing Mar ’27
BESS Cap20 GWhPhase 1 FY27-28
Margin Profile Bets: Existing steel complex (pellets, sponge iron, billets, MS rounds) targets 20-24% EBITDA. CRM targets 8-10% (new market). BESS targets 7-8% (volume play). The bet is that absolute EBITDA grows even if margins compress on commodity products, because the scale overshadows the compression.
💬 Is this vertical integration genius or executive overconfidence? Drop your take!
04 — Financials Overview
Q3 FY26: The Pellet Plant Accident & Margin Recovery
Result type: Quarterly Results | Q3 FY26 EPS: ₹2.14 | Annualised EPS (Q3×4): ₹8.56 | 9M FY26 Revenue: ₹3,770 Cr
| Metric (₹ Cr) |
Q3 FY26 Dec 2025 |
Q3 FY25 Dec 2024 |
Q2 FY26 Sep 2025 |
YoY % |
QoQ % |
| Revenue | 1,139 | 1,298 | 1,308 | -12.2% | -12.9% |
| Operating Profit | 218 | 221 | 260 | -1.4% | -16.2% |
| OPM % | 19% | 17% | 20% | +200 bps | -100 bps |
| PAT | 143 | 145 | 162 | -1.1% | -11.7% |
| EPS (₹) | 2.14 | 2.16 | 2.41 | -0.9% | -11.2% |
P/E Recalculation (Annualised): Q3 FY26 EPS ₹2.14 × 4 = ₹8.56 annualised. CMP ₹257 ÷ ₹8.56 = P/E 30x on annualised basis. Wait, that seems high. But full-year FY25 EPS was ₹13.76, which is being dragged down by the December accident. If we use trailing twelve months (TTM) EPS from the screener at ₹11.09, the P/E = 23.2x. The accident cost the company roughly 30-40 crore in lost production. Management says Q4 demand is booked. Recovery narrative intact.
The nuance: Revenue fell 12.2% YoY due to softer realizations across pellets, DRI, and finished products—a sector-wide pressure. But OPM expanded 200 basis points YoY (17% to 19%), aided by lower fuel costs, less pellet production burn, and operational efficiency gains. The accident in late September impacted Q3 pellet sales volume; the company explicitly states inventory was cleared in Q4. This is a transitory dent, not structural.
05 — Valuation: Fair Value Range
What’s This Company Worth When It’s Doubling Revenue?
Join 10,000+ investors who read this every week.