1. At a Glance
Shrem InvIT is currently trading at ₹102 with a market cap of roughly ₹6,231 crore, which is almost poetic considering its latest declared NAV is ₹94.33 per unit and book NAV is even lower at ₹70.21. Translation: the market is pricing in hope, distributions, and a prayer.
In the last three months, returns are negative (-2.63%), six months are also negative (-3.77%), and one year returns sit at a sad -10.7%. Meanwhile, the trust proudly announced its 18th distribution of ₹5.418 per unit, which is basically the only reason most unitholders are still emotionally invested.
Operationally, this is a 39-road asset InvIT across 9 states, mostly HAM-heavy, with ₹8,080 crore of debt, ~54% leverage, 1.97x DSCR, and a 7.35% weighted average cost of debt.
Revenue is growing (14.3% TTM), profits are falling (-20.9% TTM), and promoter units are 70% held with ~48% pledged, which is… let’s say “energetic governance”.
If you came here for price momentum, you’re lost.
If you came for yield stability with debt drama on the side, welcome home.
2. Introduction
Infrastructure Investment Trusts are sold to retail investors like fixed deposits with highways. Smooth annuities, predictable cash flows, inflation protection, and quarterly hugs in the form of distributions.
Shrem InvIT looked like exactly that story — until you actually read the numbers instead of the brochure.
Set up by the Shrem Group (founded in 2010 by Nitan Chhatwal), this InvIT owns a diversified portfolio of road assets across Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka, UP, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Jharkhand, Gujarat, and Chhattisgarh. On paper, that’s diversification. In reality, it’s HAM-heavy leverage with annuity seasoning and toll exposure sprinkled on top.
The trust has been extremely active in acquisitions, issuing fresh units, raising debt, and pushing leverage dangerously close to the regulatory ceiling of 60% net debt to EV. Management insists they’ll stay below the cap. Technically, they have. Emotionally, this is white-knuckle finance.
And then there’s the tax rate. Or rather, the lack of it. Negative tax percentages popping up quarter after
