Eleganz Interiors H2 & FY26: A ₹400 Cr Fit-Out Contractor Where March Did Most of the Talking
Date of Publishing -
Spotted a factual error — a wrong number, date, or fact? Tell us and we will check the source.
General information and entertainment, not investment advice. The author is not a SEBI-registered adviser or research analyst. No recommendation, no promised returns. Markets carry risk including loss of capital. Figures may not be current. Consult a registered adviser before acting.
1. At a Glance
Eleganz Interiors closed FY26 with revenue of ₹400 crore, up a whisper from ₹393 crore the year before — a 1.9% climb that, on its own, would suggest a company that spent the year idling. The full-year story hides a stranger one underneath. The first half of FY26 brought in ₹111 crore of sales; the second half delivered ₹289 crore. Net profit for FY26 landed at ₹22 crore against ₹21 crore in FY25, and operating margin held at roughly 8.5%.
So the annual figures barely moved, yet the internal split lurched. H1FY26 net profit was ₹2 crore; H2FY26 was ₹20 crore — ten times heavier. The company itself flags March as its single busiest billing month.
That concentration shows up on the balance sheet: trade receivables tripled from ₹43 crore to ₹151 crore in one year. Which raises the question the rest of this entry will circle: when a full year of profit gets booked in its final weeks, how much of “revenue” is cash, and how much is a promise dated 45 to 90 days out?
2. Introduction
Eleganz Interiors Limited was incorporated in 1996 and today builds interior fit-outs for corporate and commercial spaces — offices, R&D facilities, laboratories, airport lounges, retail. It listed on the NSE SME Emerge platform in February 2025, raising about ₹78 crore, and the promoter family, led by Chairman, Managing Director and CEO Sameer Pakvasa, still holds roughly 69%.
The company runs two delivery models: Design & Build, where it handles everything from concept to handover on a single-block price, and General Contracting, where a client’s designer sets the brief and Eleganz executes against a bill of quantities. FY26’s revenue leaned heavily to General Contracting at 81.5%, with Design & Build at 18.5% — a mix management describes as the higher-margin D&B side still building traction.
Recent corporate activity has been busy for a company this size. A postal ballot in April 2026 cleared an issue of 8,00,000 convertible warrants to the promoter and an expansion of the company’s charter objects. A Dubai subsidiary was formed, the Singapore entity is being restructured, and the order book stood at roughly ₹547 crore at 31 March 2026.
3. Business Model: WTF Do They Even Do?
Strip away the LEED certificates and the airport-lounge photography, and Eleganz is a contractor that turns a bare concrete shell into a finished workspace someone can actually sit in. When a Fortune 500 tenant leases a floor, the walls, HVAC, wiring, furniture, fire systems and audio-visual kit all have to appear. Eleganz is the outfit that makes them appear.
The two-model structure is the whole business. In Design & Build, Eleganz owns the design too, quotes one lumpsum, and pockets the margin between its estimate and its execution — which is why management keeps talking up D&B as the higher-margin future. In General Contracting, someone else drew the plans and Eleganz simply builds to a line-item BOQ, competing on price against every other contractor in the room. FY26 was 81.5% the latter — the lower-margin, tender-driven half.
Backward integration is the pitch that makes them more than a labour aggregator: a 27,190 sq ft factory near Vasai producing doors, panelling and furniture in-house, with German-tech machinery and a paint booth. The strategic tell isn’t margin, though — management has noted the factory’s real job is qualification, citing a 1.3 million sq ft project they couldn’t bid on partly because their manufacturing footprint was too small. A bigger factory is being planned near Khopoli over a two-year horizon.
Client concentration is worth marking: the top 10 customers accounted for 64.3% of FY26 revenue. Pharma/healthcare and IT were the largest industry contributions. It’s a business where a handful of Grade-A tenants effectively underwrite the year — a relationship that buys payment security and, management says, near-zero bad debts, at the price of accepting the 8–10% EBITDA those clients consider “fair enough.”
Does a factory that lifts margin by 0.2% but unlocks projects ten times larger count as a margin story or a scale story?
4. Financials Overview
Figures are consolidated, in ₹ crore. This is a half-yearly result; the latest period is H2FY26 (the six months to March 2026).
Metric
H2FY26
YoY (vs H2FY25)
Prev Half (H1FY26)
Revenue
289
+44% (from 201)
111
Operating Profit
30
+76% (from 17)
5
PAT
20
+77% (from 11)
2
EPS (₹, 6-month)
8.76
+77% (from 4.94)
1.02
The half-on-half figures are almost comic in their asymmetry: revenue up 160% versus H1, operating profit up roughly six-fold. This isn’t a turnaround; it’s the structural shape of a contractor whose customers bill and accept work in the closing months of the fiscal year.
From the concall: management guided to FY27 revenue growth of around 25–30% and said EBITDA margins would be held in the 8–9%