Search for stocks /

Jindal Steel:₹2.51 MT Steel. ₹189 Cr PAT. Capacity Doubling Amid China Chaos

Jindal Steel Q3 FY26 | EduInvesting
Q3 FY26 Results · December 2025 | Quarterly

Jindal Steel:
₹2.51 MT Steel. ₹189 Cr PAT.
Capacity Doubling Amid China Chaos

Highest production in years. New blast furnaces roaring. One-time ₹350 crore start-up cost. And management is telling you to ignore half of Q3 and focus on Q4. Welcome to the game.

Market Cap₹1,20,411 Cr
CMP₹1,180
P/E Ratio42.3x
Div Yield0.17%
ROCE10.7%

The Steel Beast That’s Learning To Walk Again

  • 52-Week High / Low₹1,272 / ₹770
  • Q3 Revenue₹15,172 Cr
  • Q3 PAT (Reported)₹189 Cr
  • Q3 EPS₹1.87
  • Annualised EPS (Q3×4)₹7.48
  • Book Value₹486
  • Price to Book2.43x
  • Debt / Equity0.39x
  • Net Debt (Q3)₹15,443 Cr
  • Net Debt/EBITDA1.72x
The Auditor’s Caveat: Jindal Steel shipped highest quarterly production in years — 2.51 MT crude steel, up 25% QoQ. But wait. ₹350 crore was a one-time start-up cost. Excluding that, PAT would have been ₹539 crore, making Q3 EBITDA around ₹1,943 crore. Management is basically saying: “The real story isn’t Q3. Q4 is where you look. We were busy commissioning, not optimizing.” Smart defence or convenient excuse? You decide.

Steel: The Business That Never Stops Being Complicated

Jindal Steel is India’s second-largest private steel producer (after JSW Steel, depending on the metric you pick). They make plates, wire rods, TMT rebars, structural steel, and lately, they’re getting aggressive about “value-added products”—fancy code for “higher-margin stuff that sounds better in presentations.”

The company operates like a vertically integrated Russian nesting doll: they dig iron ore and coal from their own mines (in India, Mozambique, Australia, South Africa). They smelt it, heat-treat it, roll it, and ship it to construction sites, automakers, and exporters across 160+ countries. Revenue: ₹50,190 crore. Market cap: ₹1.2 lakh crore. And they’re in the middle of a ₹31,000 crore capacity expansion that’s supposed to double steel production by FY27.

Q3 FY26 (December 2025) happened to be the quarter when their new blast furnaces and steel-making units roared to life. Result? Highest production in years. Also result? A ₹350 crore one-time cost (mostly coke-related inefficiencies during start-up). And lowest reported quarterly PAT in two years.

The concall transcript is a masterclass in “we’re not worried about current metrics—wait for next quarter.” Management literally walked investors through the start-up economics, the temporary cost pressures, and then casually dropped that by Q4, things normalize. Some investors bought it. Some didn’t. All of them are now watching whether Q4 PAT actually rebounds or if this “temporary” story stretches longer.

Concall Vibe (Feb 2026): “The largest portion of that ₹350 crore number is on account of coke, because it is bought-out coke at a higher cost… inferior quality.” — JSL Management. Basically: “We had to buy expensive coke while our own coke ovens were being commissioned. Next quarter? We’re self-sufficient again.”

They Dig. They Smelt. They Roll. They Ship. Rinse. Repeat.

Jindal Steel’s business model is old-school industrial: vertical integration from earth to finished steel. They own coking coal mines in Australia and Mozambique. They own iron ore mines in India, Mozambique, and South Africa. They own thermal coal, anthracite coal, and they even run a 1,634 MW captive power plant. Then they process all of this into steel at four plants (Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Jharkhand) and sell it to end-use industries.

Revenue mix (Q2 FY25): Infrastructure 40%, Distribution 31%, Building & Construction 15%, Engineering & Packaging 10%, Automotive 3%. Yes, automotive is tiny. No, they don’t seem overly concerned about EV disruption disrupting their long-term thesis. Their thinking: commercial vehicles and industrial machinery will need steel for another 20 years regardless.

Value-added products now comprise 50% of sales volumes (up from 44% a few years ago). High-tensile plates, heat-treated coils, rails, tensile structures, alloy wire rods—these carry higher margins than commodity hot rolled coils (HRC). Management’s medium-term play: shift the mix to 70% value-added and lower the volatility of earnings.

Capacity expansion at Angul (Odisha) is the kingmaker. Two new blast furnaces (9.6 MTPA combined) + three new steel-making units (9 MTPA combined) are being commissioned in phases. By end of Q4 FY26, the company expects total steelmaking capacity of 15.6 MTPA (up from 9.6 MTPA today). It’s a three-year capex marathon. The pain is now. The gain is Q4 onwards.

Crudesteel Prod (Q3)2.51 MT+25% QoQ
Steel Sales (Q3)2.28 MT+22% QoQ
Value-Add Share66%Q3 Volume Mix
Installed Capacity9.60 MTPARising to 13.75 MTPA
Export Strategy Shift: Q3 exports were down to 6% of mix (vs historical 8–10%) because export realizations were weaker than domestic pricing. Management chose domestic penetration over margin dilution. Translation: they used their expanded capacity to gobble up domestic market share rather than dump cheap steel overseas. Credible play for a capacity-ramp quarter.
💬 Question for you: If Jindal can absorb 25% higher production domestically without major discounting, does that signal real demand strength—or are they just hoarding market share before competitors ramp up?

Q3 FY26: The Ramp-Up Reveals Its True Cost

Result type: Quarterly Results  |  Q3 FY26 EPS: ₹1.87  |  Annualised EPS (Q3×4): ₹7.48  |  One-time start-up cost: ₹350 Cr

Metric (₹ Cr) Q3 FY26
Dec 2025
Q3 FY25
Dec 2024
Q2 FY26
Sep 2025
YoY % QoQ %
Revenue15,17211,75113,683+29.2%+11.0%
Operating Profit1,6292,1842,814-25.4%-42.1%
OPM %10.7%18.6%20.6%-790 bps-990 bps
EBITDA (Adjusted)1,5932,2802,812-30.1%-43.4%
EBITDA Margin %10.5%19.4%20.5%-890 bps-1000 bps
PAT189951635-80.1%-70.2%
EPS (₹)1.879.326.26-79.9%-70.1%
The Adjusted Story vs. Reported Story: Reported PAT ₹189 crore looks terrible. But excluding ₹350 crore one-time BF2 start-up cost (mostly bought-out coke), adjusted PAT would be ~₹539 crore—still down 43% YoY but more respectable for a ramp-up quarter. Management’s EBITDA/ton guidance: ₹6,981 without the start-up cost, EBITDA/ton would have been ~₹8,516. The point: volumes are real. The temporary inefficiency is real. The normalization story is plausible—but depends on Q4 execution.

What’s This Ramp-Up Story Actually Worth?

Join 10,000+ investors who read this every week.
Become a member
error: Content is protected !!