Search for stocks /

Umiya Buildcon Ltd Q1 FY26 — Real Estate Rents Meet Router Dreams: ₹15.36 Cr Annual Rentals, 65% Local Content Switches, CFO Musical Chairs, and an Other-Income Comedown Waiting to Happen

1) At a Glance

Umiya Buildcon Ltd (formerly MRO-TEK Realty) wants to be your friendly neighbourhood two-in-one—Bengaluru landlord by day, telecom gear tinkerer by night. Market cap ~₹186 Cr, CMP ₹99.3 (03 Oct close), 3-month return ~18%, and debt ~₹129 Cr (Debt/Equity ~1.72). FY25/TTM shows Sales ~₹51 Cr, reported PAT ~₹36 Cr (bloated by other income ~₹41 Cr — yes, the “Diwali bonus” came early), ROCE ~10%, ROE last year ~8%. Meanwhile, Hebbal property’s fully leased; ₹15.36 Cr/yr rentals from FY25, HDFC Bank + a Tata Group co. as anchor tenants. On the gadgets side, the “CORNUS” 1G switches (65% local content, TEC certified) just launched, plus rail/defence/IP routers, SD-WAN, UTM—basically, a buffet. Oh, and management’s been speed-running the CFO chair. Fun.

Reader check: Two pillars—rentals and routers. Which pillar do you think will actually pay the EMI on time?


2) Introduction

Once upon a time (1984) there was MRO-TEK—remember those LAN party era vibes? Fast-forward to 2025; the name is Umiya Buildcon Ltd (UBL), and the company is doing a “barbell strategy”—steady lease income on one side, “Make-in-India” telecom products on the other, and a side quest in solutions/EMS. That’s like selling samosas in the front and 5G backhaul at the back door; both can be tasty, but the kitchen’s got to be organised.

The real estate leg has started contributing visibly: Hebbal, Bengaluru is fully occupied and minting recurring rentals from FY25. The products leg is suddenly loud: DoT Trusted Source, TEC certifications, and now CORNUS switches boasting 65% local content—timely with government procurement flavours. There’s also a solutions business (managing ~1,200 links across 3 NOCs, hello BSNL) and EMS manufacturing. Somewhere in between, drone-lab MoUs and a defence-system TDMoIP device pop up like unexpected firecrackers.

But here’s the catch: TTM profits look better than they should due to a handsome other-income item. If you take that out, the “core” telecom + rentals engine feels more Alto than AMG. Which is fine—rentals are steady, telecom takes time. The trick is avoiding the classic midcap trap: shiny announcements + weak conversion to cash flows.

Reader check: Rentals: steady. Telecom: s-curve. Which one do you think the market will credit first in FY26?


3) Business Model – WTF Do They Even Do?

Think of UBL as a bi-engine plane:

  • Engine 1: Real Estate (Bengaluru + Goa)
    • Hebbal property fully leased from Apr’24; ~₹15.36 Cr annual rentals from FY25.
    • Goan land procured for development. There’s also a proposed sale of an Electronic City property to relocate electronics manufacturing—capital recycling attempt.
    • SPV with Indra Hotels (Mysore) Pvt Ltd for a North Bengaluru project (~₹13.32 Cr).
  • Engine 2: Telecom Products, Solutions & EMS
    • Products: DoT Trusted Source; TEC-certified routing & switching. Launched CORNUS family 1G switches (65% local content), IP carrier routers for railways/telecom/SIs, SD-WAN, UTM, plus a TDMoIP network interface device for a large defence SI.
    • Solutions: System-integration + operations—managing ~1,200 links with 3 Network Operation Centres; fresh BSNL order of ~₹2 Cr adds to the base.
    • EMS: Contract manufacturing of electronic components.
    • Subsidiary: Mro-Tek Technologies Pvt Ltd (₹19 lakh equity invested in FY24—tiny cheque, but it’s the operating bucket for tech).

Revenue mix FY24: Products ~37%, Solutions ~14%, AMC ~5%, Rentals ~16%, Sale of land ~11%, Interest income ~17% (yes, finance folks, that last one raised an eyebrow). Segment FY24: Products ~41%, Solutions ~26%, Real Estate ~33%.

Reader check: If rentals are one-third today, what should be the ideal split in 2 years for a clean “core” story—50/50, or do you want telecom to dominate?


4) Financials Overview

Quarterly Snapshot (Consolidated, ₹ Cr unless stated)

Source table
MetricLatest Qtr (Jun’25)YoY Qtr (Jun’24)Prev Qtr (Mar’25)YoY %QoQ %
Revenue131113+18.2%0.0%
EBITDA (Operating Profit)453–20.0%+33.3%
PAT3110NMNM
EPS (₹)16.820.800.18+2002.5%+9244.4%

Notes:

  • The PAT/EPS spike is largely other-income driven (TTM other income ~₹41 Cr), not an operational explosion.
  • Annualised EPS (latest qtr ×4) ≈ ₹67.3this is not a steady-state; treat with tongs.
  • Core operations QoQ improved at EBITDA level; YoY EBITDA declined. The topline is flat QoQ, respectable YoY.

Reader check: Would you value a telecom-cum-RE stock on an EPS boosted by “other income”? Or do you discount that like a free dessert that won’t repeat?


5) Valuation Discussion – Fair Value Range only (Education mode)

We’ll triangulate using (A) P/E, (B) EV/EBITDA, and (C) a simple DCF. Because the reported TTM includes large other income, we model two scenarios: Reported vs Core (ex other income).

A) P/E Method

  • Shares outstanding ≈ 1.87 Cr (as implied by EPS math).
  • Reported TTM EPS ≈ ₹19.15Reported P/E ≈ 99.3 / 19.15 = ~5.2× (looks cheap, but inflated by non-recurring/volatile items).
  • Core PAT estimation: TTM PAT ~₹36 Cr; “other income” ~₹41 Cr pre-tax. Assuming 25% tax, after-tax other-income ≈ ₹30.8 Cr. Core PAT ≈ ₹36 – 30.8 = ₹5.2 Cr.
    • Core EPS ≈ ₹5.2 Cr / 1.87 Cr shares ≈ ₹2.8.
    • Core P/E ≈ 99.3 / 2.8 ≈ 35.5×.

Peer P/E context: niche telecom hardware names in India often trade 30–60× when they show visible growth + clean cashflow; rent-heavy hybrids trade lower. We assign a blended P/E range on core EPS: 18×–28× if growth proof emerges (orders, margins, rentals scaling).

  • Fair Value (P/E on Core EPS ₹2.8): ₹50 – ₹78.
  • If we give partial credit for recurring rentals and a path to product scale, a stretch multiple 28×–35× pushes to ₹78 – ₹98 (upper end assumes steady proof of telecom margin + rentals kickers).

B) EV / EBITDA Method

  • EV ≈ ₹302 Cr (given).
  • TTM EBITDA (Operating Profit) ≈ ₹18 Cr → current EV/EBITDA ≈ 16.8×.
  • Comparable small-mid Indian comms hardware with growth cues: 12–18× EV/EBITDA; rent-heavy mixed stories: 8–12×.
    • Apply 10×–14× to a normalized EBITDA band. If EBITDA normalizes to ₹15–20 Cr (ex volatile items, with rentals stabilising and products scaling), EV ₹150–₹280 Cr.
    • Net debt ≈ ₹129 Cr; equity value EV – Net Debt₹21–₹151 Cr.
    • Per share (1.87 Cr): ₹11 – ₹81.
      (Yes, wide—because core margin & order conversion are the swing factors.)

C) DCF (back-of-envelope FCFF)

  • Base FY26E “core” revenue considered at ~₹55–60 Cr (rentals ~₹15–16 Cr + products/solutions/EMS ~₹40–44 Cr).
  • “Core” EBITDA margin assumed 18–22% (products scale + rentals steady), tax 25%, reinvestment needs moderate (working capital historically volatile; assume reinvestment rate 30–40% of NOPAT).
  • Implied FCFF margin ~7–9% on revenue.
  • 5-year FCFF growth 12–16%, terminal growth 4–5%, WACC 12–14% (smallcap, manufacturing risk, leverage ~1.7× D/E).
  • DCF equity value per share roughly bands into ₹60 – ₹95.

Blended Fair Value Range (Educational)

₹60 – ₹95 with upside tail ₹98 if telecom execution + cash conversion firm up in FY26 (and management churn stabilises).

Disclaimer: This fair value range is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice.

Reader check: Which lens do you prefer—P/E on core, EV/EBITDA, or DCF? And why do DCFs always make you feel like you’re bargaining for mangoes?


6) What’s Cooking – News, Triggers, Drama

  • CORNUS 1G Switches launched (Sept’25): 65% local content, TEC-certified, aimed at telecom,
Continue reading with a premium membership.
Become a member
error: Content is protected !!